3
7
8
3
92
Light yellowish brown and greenish brown SAND (SP)
Very dark greenish gray CLAY (CH)
- w/ silt 2'-6'
4-5-4
3-7-10
6-10-6
= Unconf. Comp.
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
= UU Triaxial
= Torvane
SOIL/ROCK CLASSIFICATION
Shear Types:
PLATE A-3
SOIL
SYMBOLS
SAMPLER
SYMBOLS
AND
FIELD
TEST
DATA
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
ELEV.
DEPTH,
FEET
= Hand Penet.
LIQUID
LIMIT
Date: 2/13/2006
Northing: 13,699,038.0
Easting: 3,303,071.0
Project: Sand Search for DMPAs
Boring No.: B-3
Groundwater during drilling: ---
Groundwater after drilling: ---
LOG
OF
BORING
PLASTIC
LIMIT
CONTENT,
%
MOISTURE
SHEAR
STRENGTH,
TSF
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Project No.: HG-05-28280
Elevation: 17.93 feet
Station: --
Offset: --
PLATE C-5
2 1 1/2
1 3/4 1/2 3/8
1/4 4
8 10
16
20
30 40 5060 80100
140 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Grain
Size
in
Millimeters
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Boring No.
B-3
Depth,
Ft.
2-4'
Classific at ion
Light yellowish brown and greenish
brown
Sand
U.S. Standard Sieve Openings in Inches
U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers
Hydrometer
PLATE C-6
2 1 1/2
1 3/4
1/2 3/8
1/4 4
8 10
16
20
30 40 50 60 80100
140 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Grain
Size
in
Millimeters
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Boring No.
B-3
Depth,
Ft.
6-8'
Classific at ion
Light yellowish brown and greenish
brown
Sand
U.S. Standard Sieve Openings in Inches
U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers
Hydrometer
SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA
Project:
Sand Search
Job No.
HG-05-28280 Date:
02/15/06
Boring No.
3
Sample No.
2
Depth:
2-4'
Matl Desc.
Light yellowish brown and greenish brown Sand
Tare No.
6
Init Wt. - Tare
100.54
% Ret.
92.58
Tare Wt.
6.89
Dry Wt. after test
99.97
% Pass #200
7.42
Init. Dry Wt.
107.43
Wt. Ret. on #200
93.08
Sieve Size/No.
Sieve Size (mm)
Weight Ret.
% Retained
% Passing
3/8"
9.5
0.00
0.00
100.00
4
4.76
0.33
0.33
99.67
8
2.38
1.02
1.01
98.99
10
2
1.20
1.19
98.81
16
1.19
2.47
2.46
97.54
30
0.59
4.80
4.77
95.23
50
0.297
7.09
7.05
92.95
100
0.149
26.17
26.03
73.97
200
0.074
93.08
92.58
7.42
0.066
1.66
0.047
1.66
0.033
1.66
0.021
1.66
0.015
1.66
0.012
1.66
0.009
1.66
0.006
1.66
0.003
1.66
0.003
1.66
0.001
0.00
PLATE C-5b
SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA
Project:
Sand Search
Job No.
HG-05-28280 Date:
02/15/06
Boring No.
3
Sample No.
4
Depth:
6-8'
Matl Desc.
Light yellowish brown and greenish brown Sand
Tare No.
8
Init Wt. - Tare
73.65
% Ret.
97.09
Tare Wt.
6.92
Dry Wt. after test
78.43
% Pass #200
2.91
Init. Dry Wt.
80.57
Wt. Ret. on #200
71.51
Sieve Size/No.
Sieve Size (mm)
Weight Ret.
% Retained
% Passing
4
4.76
0.72
0.98
99.02
8
2.38
2.31
3.14
96.86
10
2
2.60
3.53
96.47
16
1.19
4.70
6.38
93.62
30
0.59
7.15
9.71
90.29
50
0.297
9.11
12.37
87.63
100
0.149
24.94
33.86
66.14
200
0.074
71.51
97.09
2.91
0.066
1.6
PLATE C-6b
PLATE D-5
2 1 1/2
1 3/4 1/2 3/8
1/4 4
8 10
16
20
30 40 5060 80100
140 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Grain
Size
in
Millimeters
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Boring No.
B-3
Depth,
Ft.
0-2'
Classific at ion
Light yellowish brown and greenish
brown
Sand
U.S. Standard Sieve Openings in Inches
U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers
Hydrometer
PLATE D-6
2 1 1/2
1 3/4 1/2 3/8
1/4 4
8 10
16
20
30 40 5060 80100
140 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Grain
Size
in
Millimeters
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Boring No.
B-3
Depth,
Ft.
4-6'
Classific at ion
Light yellowish brown and greenish
brown Sand with silt
U.S. Standard Sieve Openings in Inches
U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers
Hydrometer
PLATE D-7
2 1 1/2
1 3/4
1/2 3/8
1/4 4
8 10
16
20
30 40 50 60 80100
140 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Grain
Size
in
Millimeters
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Boring No.
B-3
Depth,
Ft.
8-10'
Classific at ion
Very dark greenish gray Clay
U.S. Standard Sieve Openings in Inches
U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers
Hydrometer
SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA
Project:
Sand Search
Job No.
HG-05-28280
Date:
02/15/06
Boring No.
3
Sample No.
1
Depth:
0-2 ft
Matl Desc.
Light yellowish brown and greenish brown Sand
Tare No.
4
Init Wt. - Tare
92.31
% Ret.
97.29
Tare Wt.
6.72
Dry Wt. after test
96.53
% Pass #200
2.71
Init. Dry Wt.
99.03
Wt. Ret. on #200
89.81
Sieve Size/No.
Sieve Size (mm)
Weight Ret.
% Retained
% Passing
3/8"
9.5
0.00
0.00
100.00
4
4.76
0.36
0.39
99.61
8
2.38
2.31
2.50
97.50
10
2
2.72
2.95
97.05
16
1.19
7.13
7.72
92.28
30
0.59
14.05
15.22
84.78
50
0.297
18.66
20.21
79.79
100
0.149
37.95
41.11
58.89
200
0.074
89.81
97.29
2.71
PLATE D-5b
SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA
Project:
Sand Search
Job No.
HG-05-28280
Date:
02/15/06
Boring No.
3
Sample No.
3
Depth:
4-6'
Matl Desc.
Light yellowish brown and greenish brown Sand with silt
Tare No.
7
Init Wt. - Tare
98.92
% Ret.
92.10
Tare Wt.
6.91
Dry Wt. after test
98.02
% Pass #200
7.90
Init. Dry Wt.
105.83
Wt. Ret. on #200
91.11
Sieve Size/No.
Sieve Size (mm)
Weight Ret.
% Retained
% Passing
3/4"
19.1
2.79
2.82
97.18
3/8"
9.5
3.96
4.00
96.00
4
4.76
7.93
8.02
91.98
8
2.38
13.75
13.90
86.10
10
2
14.79
14.95
85.05
16
1.19
23.17
23.42
76.58
30
0.59
34.83
35.21
64.79
50
0.297
43.04
43.51
56.49
100
0.149
58.50
59.14
40.86
200
0.074
91.11
92.10
7.90
PLATE D-6b
SIEVE ANALYSIS DATA
Project:
Sand Search
Job No.
HG-05-28280
Date:
02/15/06
Boring No.
3
Sample No.
5
Depth:
8-10'
Matl Desc.
Very dark greenish gray Clay
Tare No.
20
Init Wt. - Tare
66.58
% Ret.
8.11
Tare Wt.
6.68
Dry Wt. after test
12.08
% Pass #200
91.89
Init. Dry Wt.
73.26
Wt. Ret. on #200
5.40
Sieve Size/No.
Sieve Size (mm)
Weight Ret.
% Retained
% Passing
3/8"
9.5
0.00
0.00
100.00
4
4.76
0.22
0.33
99.67
8
2.38
0.98
1.47
98.53
10
2
1.16
1.74
98.26
16
1.19
1.86
2.79
97.21
30
0.59
2.42
3.63
96.37
50
0.297
2.75
4.13
95.87
100
0.149
3.76
5.65
94.35
200
0.074
5.40
8.11
91.89
PLATE D-7b
Median Sand Size:
Diameter formulas must be adjusted for accurate percentage, formulas are interpolation equations
D
50
=
0.13
D
16
=
0.27
D
84
=
0.07
φ
50
=
3.0
φ
16
=
1.9
φ
84
=
3.8
D
5
=
1.99
D
95
=
0.03
φ
5
=
-1.0
φ
95
=
4.9
Mean:
PHI
mm
M
dφ
= (φ
16+
φ
84
)/2 =
2.9
0.1
Standard Deviation:
σ
φ
<= 0.5: Sample is well sorted.
σ
φ
= (φ
84
− φ
16
)/4+(φ
95
−φ
5
)/6 =
1.5
Poorly Sorted
σ
φ
>= 1.0: Sample is poorly sorted.
Skewness:
α
φ
= (φ
16
+ φ
84
−(2∗φ
50
))/(2(φ
84
− φ
16
)+(φ
5
+ φ
95
−(2∗φ
50
))/(2(φ
95
− φ
5
) =
α
φ
< -0.1: Sample is Coarse-Skewed
0.2
Fine-Skewed
α
φ
-0.1 to +0.1: Sample is Near-Symmetrical
α
φ
> +0.1: Sample is Fine-Skewed
February 13, 2006
Sample Analysis Performed by:
TAMUG
Grain Size Analysis Performed by:
GBA, Associates
Hole No:
3
Sample No:
3C
Depth:
2-3 ft
Note: Enter data in to the green cells
Sieve Size, (No.)
Sieve Size, (mm)
Cumulative
Weight Retained
on Sieve, (grams)
Weight Retained
on Sieve, (grams)
Phi, f
% Coarser by
Weight
% Finer than
by Weight
10
2
17.11
17.11
-1.0
14.13%
85.87%
14
1.41
29.27
12.16
-0.5
24.17%
75.83%
18
1
42.38
13.11
0.0
34.99%
65.01%
25
0.71
54.85
12.47
0.5
45.29%
54.71%
35
0.5
63.27
8.42
1.0
52.24%
47.76%
45
0.354
67.42
4.15
1.5
55.66%
44.34%
60
0.25
70.43
3.01
2.0
58.15%
41.85%
80
0.177
74.98
4.55
2.5
61.91%
38.09%
125
0.125
100.56
25.58
3.0
83.03%
16.97%
170
0.088
113.61
13.05
3.5
93.80%
6.20%
200
0.074
118.67
5.06
3.8
97.98%
2.02%
230
0.0625
120.66
1.99
4.0
99.62%
0.38%
Pan
0.0039
121.12
0.46
8.0
100.00%
0.00%
Total Weight of Sediment =
121.12
grams
R
equisition No. 317-6-0482
Work Order No. 1306-06-001
Dredged Material Placement Area (DMPA)
Pelican Island Geotechnical investigation
GLO Contract No. 06-090C
Median Sand Size:
Diameter formulas must be adjusted for accurate percentage, formulas are interpolation equations
D
50
=
0.57
D
16
=
1.89
D
84
=
0.12
φ
50
=
0.8
φ
16
=
-0.9
φ
84
=
3.0
D
5
=
2.54
D
95
=
0.08
φ
5
=
-1.3
φ
95
=
3.6
Mean:
PHI
mm
M
dφ
= (φ
16+
φ
84
)/2 =
1.1
0.5
Standard Deviation:
σ
φ
<= 0.5: Sample is well sorted.
σ
φ
= (φ
84
− φ
16
)/4+(φ
95
−φ
5
)/6 =
1.8
Poorly Sorted
σ
φ
>= 1.0: Sample is poorly sorted.
Skewness:
α
φ
= (φ
16
+ φ
84
−(2∗φ
50
))/(2(φ
84
− φ
16
)+(φ
5
+ φ
95
−(2∗φ
50
))/(2(φ
95
− φ
5
) =
α
φ
< -0.1: Sample is Coarse-Skewed
-0.1
Coarse-Skewed
α
φ
-0.1 to +0.1: Sample is Near-Symmetrical
α
φ
> +0.1: Sample is Fine-Skewed
Auger 3 Sample 3C Depth 2 to 3 ft, Sieve Analysis
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Grain Size in Phi
Percent Finer By Weight
February 13, 2006
Sample Analysis Performed by:
TAMUG
Grain Size Analysis Performed by:
GBA, Associates
Hole No:
3
Sample No:
3B
Depth:
1-2 ft
Note: Enter data in to the green cells
Sieve Size, (No.)
Sieve Size, (mm)
Cumulative
Weight Retained
on Sieve, (grams)
Weight Retained
on Sieve, (grams)
Phi, f
% Coarser by
Weight
% Finer than
by Weight
10
2
26.44
26.44
-1.0
21.74%
78.26%
14
1.41
30.94
4.5
-0.5
25.44%
74.56%
18
1
35.01
4.07
0.0
28.79%
71.21%
25
0.71
38.3
3.29
0.5
31.49%
68.51%
35
0.5
41.12
2.82
1.0
33.81%
66.19%
45
0.354
42.85
1.73
1.5
35.23%
64.77%
60
0.25
46.4
3.55
2.0
38.15%
61.85%
80
0.177
57.02
10.62
2.5
46.88%
53.12%
125
0.125
98.41
41.39
3.0
80.92%
19.08%
170
0.088
112.58
14.17
3.5
92.57%
7.43%
200
0.074
118.29
5.71
3.8
97.26%
2.74%
230
0.0625
120.75
2.46
4.0
99.28%
0.72%
Pan
0.0039
121.62
0.87
8.0
100.00%
0.00%
Total Weight of Sediment =
121.62
grams
R
equisition No. 317-6-0482
Work Order No. 1306-06-001
Dredged Material Placement Area (DMPA)
Pelican Island Geotechnical investigation
GLO Contract No. 06-090C
Median Sand Size:
Diameter formulas must be adjusted for accurate percentage, formulas are interpolation equations
D
50
=
0.17
D
16
=
0.54
D
84
=
0.06
φ
50
=
2.5
φ
16
=
0.9
φ
84
=
4.2
D
5
=
0.53
D
95
=
0.02
φ
5
=
0.9
φ
95
=
5.6
Mean:
PHI
mm
M
dφ
= (φ
16+
φ
84
)/2 =
2.5
0.2
Standard Deviation:
σ
φ
<= 0.5: Sample is well sorted.
σ
φ
= (φ
84
− φ
16
)/4+(φ
95
−φ
5
)/6 =
1.6
Poorly Sorted
σ
φ
>= 1.0: Sample is poorly sorted.
Skewness:
α
φ
= (φ
16
+ φ
84
−(2∗φ
50
))/(2(φ
84
− φ
16
)+(φ
5
+ φ
95
−(2∗φ
50
))/(2(φ
95
− φ
5
) =
α
φ
< -0.1: Sample is Coarse-Skewed
-0.2
Coarse-Skewed
α
φ
-0.1 to +0.1: Sample is Near-Symmetrical
α
φ
> +0.1: Sample is Fine-Skewed
Auger 3 Sample 3B Depth 1 to 2 ft, Sieve Analysis
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Grain Size in Phi
Percent Finer By Weight
February 13, 2006
Sample Analysis Performed by:
TAMUG
Grain Size Analysis Performed by:
GBA, Associates
Hole No:
3
Sample No:
3A
Depth:
0-1 ft
Note: Enter data in to the green cells
Sieve Size, (No.)
Sieve Size, (mm)
Cumulative
Weight Retained
on Sieve, (grams)
Weight Retained
on Sieve, (grams)
Phi, f
% Coarser by
Weight
% Finer than
by Weight
10
2
4.97
4.97
-1.0
4.95%
95.05%
14
1.41
6.83
1.86
-0.5
6.80%
93.20%
18
1
8.43
1.60
0.0
8.39%
91.61%
25
0.71
9.75
1.32
0.5
9.70%
90.30%
35
0.5
10.72
0.97
1.0
10.67%
89.33%
45
0.354