DRILLING LOG
1.
PROJECT
j
OIVISION
Southwestern
Neches River - Channel to Evadale
2. COCA nON (Coordjnates- or
Station)
3. DRILLING AGENCY
Ln. s.
Armv
_of Rnp;
4. HOLE NO.
(A~li]
shown
on
drawjnQ title
I
Bnd
file nurnbeJ:')
I
5. NAME OF DRILLER
Curtis
6. DIRECTION OF HOLE
D
VERT.lCAL
D
INCLINED
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN
8. DEPTH DRILLED INTo ROCK
9. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE
20.0
3ST-29
DEG. FROM VERT.
Hole No.
3ST-29
I~STALLATION
Ga'v Dist, _Eng Div
j
5HEET
_ .OF
SHEETS
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT
'1, DATUM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN
(TBMorMSL)
12. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER-
:DISTURBED
BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN\
3 Jars
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
16. DATE HOLE
{STARTED
: 25 Feb
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING
19.
SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR
,
rUND1STURBED
,
'COMPLETED
: 25 Feb 1966
%
ELEVATION I DEPTH ILEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Description)
%CORE I
BOX OR
RECOV- SAMPLE
ERY
NO.
REMARKS
(Drillins time, water
,loss,
depth
of
weatherinS, etc.,
if
significant)
a
g
0.0
4.0
13.0
15.0
lS.O
20.0
23.0
b
4.0
13.0_
15.0-
lS.O-
20.0
=
23.0=
25.0_
ENG FORM
1836
1 APR 63
c
d
Embankment
Water
Gray
sand, clay layer and
organic
13.0-13.5 No count
13.5-14.0 1 blow
14.0-14.5 No count
Same as below, washed
Gray
sand,
lS.0-lS.5
lS.5-19.0
19.0-19.5
19.5-20.0
medium clay
No count
7 blows
12 blows
No count
Same as below, washed
layer
Gray sand, medium w/clay laye
No recovery on sand, .2 clay
in tube, washed sand
23.0-23.5 No count
23.5-24.0 19 blows
24.0-24.5 17 blows
24.5-25.0 No count
BOTTOMED
River Bank 4.0
Water depth 9.0
PREVIOUS 'EDITIONS MAY BE USED
(EM 1110-1-1801)
e
f
Jar 1
No sample
Jar 2
No sample
Jar 3
PROJECTNeches River
---- -------- '" I-HOLE NO.
c~!!!!glJ;g!!iy:~d-'!l~
..._ .. __ ..
~ST,:29.
__..__
"
!\9
!:'t~
\¥.I
-
--,-,,>~.~
"
'."
-,",,-~;,,,-,",'
SWG Form 261(C)
28 Jan 1965
TEST DATA SUMMAkY.
PROJECT: .
de
('
'e.S' £r
~
e r
BORING NO.
3s
f~-
,:;:;(.:3
LOC<\T10N:Ch«'I//1
('
I
P
E
V4 d
ct / c
DATE DRILLED
2.5
EC;;
1.90L.
r-r--
I
...:I
1:>
Z
T-]
<t:
•
SIEVE ANALYSIS
~l
f-I............
~l
H
We-.!
<
o
z
:t:
~+d~ 2,~C"<TmN
:':::'_I_O_N___
0
""
E-I
.~
en
.-<
~
Z'-'
~
'"
If-! .
H
~E..:
CI)l:~
"I "''''''
Ace. WT. RTND.
E-I
f:;]
0::
'"
-...
'" ::>
E-I
L"
'"
I
<Xl
Z
•
.J
.-l
~
SIEVE NO.
(3)
'"'
E-l
.U)
U)
Ptl
Ihl U
e
.
<t:
•
.
CI)
.
CI)
uf;ll
Z::;:H~
...:I
'"
",...:I
...:I
A
~
E-I
en
f§
o
<t:0§l
I~'
'"'
'" <Xl
E-I...:I
0
Q,
1;;
:;j
'"'
Z
U
04
U) p:j
0
L~.-
"
CI)
'"
H
I
I
I
-..)...----
T4-=--'j:'--
.
t:;::~ys~i,5:-
(-7;::',/.
</~1'/ ~;'?'/n:
>
:?f'-.::-?"
--;/Y)
L.
I
2,U=:"=:~~
..
f.==r-~'------."'"-
[~t)~::"~~
_-_.. _.
D.
19
25'-;;~~--.~_-=-:'-C:.Oo·
R,o; 14
S(')
0
c~
/<1.
-1-_3
,~~
'?'P::-?'::
f---.-..-.
.-
-. ,-
-,
;~~~:~~==·=l=~·.r.-·-·c-·.
+._.._.+-+--1--+-+-+---1
bt~?orz;
..•.
~ ~ ~
RC:d
In
~~FL_"""2~.~==~~--i.+_-"_-_~'
..
'-+-_'
.._
....
-\."-+-1---+-+---+--+'--1
LL___.-
'-r-~
•
-------f--f---l-+--lf--j---f--+--+---l-+---j
l
We
-~=;)
;/,--"
C
- (')/;.,..' (' ;. ,v'/S
./,,' -.1
r
./
1/
".~
/""-
.9. '.,
.
,"
--~===----~
------
-j~-~t·;·:-~
'-1--'--1--I---i--jf--\----!---l-H
~1'~~-~~-1-.--.
---~
_.
e-.--
~==~=~ -:~~
:=-:
l':~~
I