---

---

Project

:

___

D~is:tpo:::s:!:a~I.,:A:::r.::e.::a:s.!N.:.:o:::s!;;.2::..!:a~n::::d..:.4~lo:!r..:.B~r~o:!:w~n~s!;vi~lIe:..:S;::h!!lip~C:!.h~a~n!!ne~I,-_

SUMMARY

OF

LABORATORY

TEST

RESULTS

Browns

v

ille

,

Texas

Contract No.

DACW64-92-D-OOOI

Del

ive

ry order

No. 0008

Boring No.

SPT

Dry

Wet

Depth

PP

Blows

Visual

USC

Me

Un

it

Unit

LL

SII

(It)

(tsl)

per

Classification

(

%)

WI

WI

(%)

Foot

(pefl

(pefl

1

0

.

5

-

2

1/1

-

Gray,Sand,Very

loose,Silty

SM

12

.

2

2-4

0.25

Gray,Clay.Soft,w/sand seams and

sand

pockets

CH

33.4

86.7

115.7

59

-

3

4

.

5-6

2

Gray,Sand.

Very loose.Silty

SM

4

6

.

5-8

4

Gray,Sand,Loose,Silty

SM

5

8.5-10

5

Gray,Sand.Loose.Silty

SM

6

13

.5-

15

4

Gray,Sand,Loose,Silty

SM

..

S

# :

Sample Number,

P P

:

Pocket Penetrometer Reading, USC

.

Umfled

SOil Classlfrcatlon,

Me

.

MOisture

Content

q

u

:

Unconfined

Compressive

Strength, W

0

H

:

Weight

of

hammer,

WOP

:

Weight of pipe

GBotest Engineering,

Inc.

92-30

Mechanical

Analysis

PL

%

Passing

('Y.)