1. Block A-36Galveston Area
      1. PLAN OF BORINGS
      2. DESIGN STRENGTH PARAMETERS
      3. DESIGN SUBMERGED UNIT WEIGHT
      4. UNIT SKIN FRICTION
      5. AXIAL LOAD TRANSFER DATA
      6. P-YDATA
      7. STRESS-STRAIN CURVES
      8. Strain in Percent
      9. STRESS-STRAIN CURVES
      10. Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression Test
      11. Texas Offshore Port System, SPM #1 PLET
      12. Block A-36, Galveston Area
      13. STRESS-STRAIN CURVES

    alt
    I
    I
    Appendix B contains discussions of analytical procedures used in our engineering analyses. Appendix C
    contains a positioning report by Fugro Chance, Inc.,
    of Lafayette, Louisiana.
    For the purposes
    of discussion and presentation, "driven pipe pile" is used in this report to represent
    foundation piles, caissons and conductors, unless otherwise specified.
    2.2 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
    The field investigation was performed
    on June 26 through 28, 2008, from the RN
    Seaprobe.
    The
    soil conditions were determined by performing four exploratory borings, two at each SPM location with one
    boring at a selected anchor leg location, and one boring at the proposed PLET location. Enterprise Field
    Services selected the boring locations. These borings were drilled to a penetration of 131-ft below mudline.
    The water depths
    at the boring locations ranged from 110 to 113 It. A chronological summary of field
    operations is presented
    in Appendix A.
    2.2.1
    Exploratory Borings
    FMMG personnel drilled the soil borings with a DMX drill rig positioned over the centerwell of the
    RN
    Seaprobe.
    The vessel was anchored at the boring location by a 4-point mooring system.
    Soil
    conditions
    at the site were explored by drilling a group of four soil borings to 131-ft penetration below the
    seafloor. The final coordinates
    for the boring locations are presented in Table 2-1. A plan of borings within
    BlockA-36, of the Galveston Area is presented on Plate 2-1. Fugro Chance, Inc., of Lafayette, Louisiana,
    conducted surveying utilizing STARFIX and DGPS, and performed a 360-degree scanning sonar survey.
    The positioning report, prepared by Fugro Chance, is presented in Appendix
    C. The scanning sonar reports
    are available from Fugro Chance upon request.
    FMMG
    Boring
    Designation
    SPM #1 PLET
    SPM
    #1 Anchor
    Leg #2
    SPM#2 PLET
    SPM-#TAncnor
    Leg
    #6
    Table 2-1: Final Boring Coordinates
    (Texas South Central Zone Coordinates)
    Fugro Chance
    Boring
    Proposed Boring
    Final Boring
    Designation
    Coordinates
    Coordinates
    Core 3
    X = 3,276,605.26 ft
    X = 3,276,615 ft
    Y = 265,296.65 ft
    Y = 265,270 ft
    Core 1
    X = 3,275,201.70 ft
    X = 3,275,180 ft
    Y = 264,859.70 ft
    Y
    =
    264,853 ft
    Core 4
    X = 3,283,609.94 ft
    X = 3,283,617 ft
    Y
    =
    269,139.12 ft
    Y = 269,118 ft
    Core 2
    X-=-3;284~7t3:02-ft-
    -X-=-3;-284;-7-33-ft
    Y = 270,110.77 ft
    Y = 270,117 ft
    Boring
    Termination
    Depth
    (ft)
    131
    131
    131
    131
    Samples were obtained through 5.0-in.-OD, 4.5-in.-IF drill pipe at all the locations. Samples were
    spaced
    at 3-ft intervals to 20-ft penetration, at 5-ft intervals to 68-ft penetration, and at 10-ft intervals
    thereafter to the final boring depth at all the locations, except at the SPM #2 PLET location. Sampling
    intervals at the SPM #2 PLET location was completed as follows: 3-ft intervals to 23-ft penetration, 5-ft
    intervals to 71-ft penetration, and 10-ft intervals thereafter to the final boring depth. Additionally, a 5-ft
    I
    _~
    ____
    R_ep_o_rt_N_O._O_20_1_-6_50_1____________________________
    2_~
    ____

    alt
    I
    shallow boring, designated as Core 4A by Fugro Chance, was drilled at the SPM #2 PLET location to allow
    re-sampling. The drilling and sampling techniques used to complete these borings are explained
    in detail in
    Appendix A.
    Two water depths were measured at each boring location using a seafloor sensor seated in the drill
    bit. The water depth measurements are tabulated in Table 2-2. These water depth measurements are
    intended for the purpose
    of the geotechnical investigation only, and are not corrected for tidal or other
    variations.
    If utilized for other purposes, the water depth measurement should be adjusted to account for
    meteorological tide and datum corrections. The water depth measuring procedures are explained in detail
    in Appendix A.
    \ '
    Table 2-2: Measured Water Depths
    Boring
    Water Depth
    Time and Date
    Supplemental
    Time and Date
    Designation
    (ft)
    of Measurement
    Water Depth
    of Measurement
    (ft)
    SPM#1 PLET
    112
    1630 hours on
    113
    2245 hours on
    June 27,2008
    June 27, 2008
    SPM
    #1 ANCHOR
    113
    2400 hours on
    113
    0605 hours
    on
    LEG #2
    June 26, 2008
    June 27, 2008
    SPM#2 PLET
    112
    0250 hours
    on
    112
    1030 hours
    on
    June 28, 2008
    June 28, 2008
    SPM #2 ANCHOR
    110
    1450 hours on
    111
    2105 hours on
    LEG #6
    June 28, 2008
    June 28, 2008
    2.2.2 Field and
    Laboratory Tests
    The soil testing program was designed to evaluate pertinent index and engineering properties of the
    foundation soils. During the field operation, all samples were extruded from the sampler and classified by
    the soil technician or field engineer.
    Unit weight, Torvane, pocket penetrometer, miniature vane and
    unconsolidated-undrained triaxial compression tests were performed
    in the field on selected cohesive
    samples. All
    of the samples were shipped to Fugro's Houston laboratory where Atterberg limit tests, water
    content tests, and grain-size analyses, as well as additional density tests, unconsolidated-undrained triaxial
    compression tests, and miniature vane tests, were performed.
    A description
    of relevant laboratory procedures is provided in Appendix A. The strength and
    classification test results are presented graphically
    on the Logs of Boring and Test Results in Section 3.
    Grain-Size distribution curves from sieve-analyses and stress-strain curves from triaxial compression tests
    ____--'a"re
    ___llresented in
    AflP~e~n~d~ix~A~.
    ______________________________
    2.3 GENERAL SOIL CONDITIONS
    2.3.1
    Soil Stratigraphy
    The soil stratigraphy at each of the boring locations disclosed by the field and laboratory
    investigation
    is presented in Section 3. The soil stratigraphy is based on the classification of soil samples
    I __
    ~
    ___
    R_ep_o_rt_N_O_.O_2_01_-_65_0_1______________________________2_.3_____

    alt
    ~
    (
    D
    11-
    I
    l
    1
    ~
    (~:
    ...
    x =
    3,274,000«
    ~
    Y =
    275,800
    It
    N
    ~
    ...
    X
    =
    3,279,000ft
    Block A-36
    Galveston Area
    ...
    X
    =
    3,284,000ft
    ~
    Y =
    270,800
    It
    SPM.!2,.Anchor Leg #6'"
    -
    .....
    Offshore
    Terminal
    /
    ,
    ~
    Y =
    265,800
    It
    I
    SPM #1 PLET \
    SPM
    #1 Anchclr Leg
    #21
    \
    I
    \
    1,470f!,
    "
    /
    ....
    -
    ~
    Y =
    260,800
    It
    ,.
    .....
    /
    'e
    I
    \
    ...
    I SPM #2 PLET \
    \
    1,47~1
    "
    .... _-
    "
    ...
    ~
    m
    ~
    1l
    ---~-~------I---------~~----------------------------------------------I-----------­
    Ii!
    15..
    u
    ~
    «
    ~
    Projection: Texas South Central Zone Coordinates
    __@
    Report No.
    0201-6501
    PLAN OF BORINGS
    Texas Offshore Port System, Offshore Terminal Location
    BlockA-36, Galveston Area
    PLATE
    2-1

    alt
    TERMS AND SYMBOLS USED ON BORING LOG
    SOIL TYPES
    SAMPLER TYPES
    []Sand
    m
    Sill
    ~Clay
    ~GraVel
    ~Debris
    ~Liner
    ~In
    Silu
    o:Iog
    o
    ••
    ~Thin-
    ...
    ..•
    Walled
    Test
    ~coral
    Tube
    m
    SillY
    mSandY
    ~SandY
    ~peator
    • Sand
    . Sill
    . Clay
    Highly
    Organic
    I
    ~
    [
    J;
    j
    Sand
    ~Clayey
    mClayey
    Silt
    mSillY
    Clay
    I
    Rock
    ~PiSlon
    v.,.v
    Shell
    ~ROCk
    ~NO
    "
    Core
    Recovery
    "
    "
    I
    SOIL GRAIN SIZE
    u.s. STANDARD SIEVE
    J"
    314"
    4
    10
    40
    200
    COBBLES
    GRAVEL
    SAND
    SILT
    COARSE
    FINE
    COARSE
    MEDIUM
    FINE
    152
    76.2
    19.1
    4.76
    2.00
    0.420
    0.074
    SOil GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
    STRENGTH OF COHESIVE SOILS(1)
    Undrained
    DENSITY OF GRANULAR SOILS
    2•J
    )
    Consistency
    Shear Strength,
    Kips Per
    89 Ft
    Descriptive
    *Relative
    Term
    Density,
    %
    Very Soft.................................................
    less than 0.25
    0.25100.50
    Very Loose.................................................
    less than 15
    Soft............................................................
    Loose................................ ,... .......................... 15 to 35
    Firm................................................ ...........
    0.5010 1.00
    Medium Dense.................................................
    351065
    SliIL.........................................................
    1.0010 2.00
    Oense.............................................................
    65 to 85
    Very Sliff....................................................
    2.00 to 4.00
    Very Dense............................................
    greater than
    85
    Hard..................................................",
    greater than 4.00
    *Estimated from sampler driving record
    .Slickensided..........................
    Fissured................................
    Pocket. .................................
    Parting.......................
    Seam....................................
    Layer....................................
    Laminated.............................
    SOIL STRUCTURE(1)
    Having planes of weakness that appear slick and glossy. The degree of slickensidedness depends
    upon the spacing
    of slickensides and the ease of breaking along these planes.
    Containing shrinkage
    or relief cracks, often filled with fine sand or
    sil~
    usually more or less vertical.
    Inclusion
    of material of different texture that is smaller than the diameter of the sample.
    InclusiOr1less
    tfian'1/8 'iilch-ftlick extenCing-tIlrough-too-sample: -----
    InclUsion
    1/8
    inch to 3 inches thick extending through the sample.
    Inclusion greater than 3 inches
    thick extending through the sample.
    Soil
    sample composed of alternating partings or seams of different soil types.
    ---~-~--------~~~~,-------------~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ch.~~-----------------------------
    "C
    "C
    Interlayered...........................
    Soil sample composed of alternating layers of different soil types.
    x..
    ~
    ' 0
    ~
    !
    .:;:-
    Intermixed.............................
    Soil sample composed of pockets of different soil types and layered or laminated structure is not
    evident.
    Calcareous............................
    REFERENCES:
    (1) ASTM D 2488
    (2) ASCE Manual
    56 (1976)
    (3)
    ASTM D 2049
    Having appreciable quantities of carbonate.
    Information on each boring log is a compilation
    of subsurface conditions and soil or rock
    classifications obtained from the field as well as from laboratory testing
    of samples. Strata have been
    interpreted
    by commonly accepted procedures. The stratum lines on the log may be transitional and
    approximate in nature.
    Water level measurements refer only to those observed at the times and
    places indicated in the text, and
    may vary with
    tim~,
    geologic condition or construction activity.
    I
    Report No.
    0201-6501
    -~---------------------------------
    PLATE 2-2

    alt
    '"
    ,.
    ."
    Report No. 0201-6501
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    j
    ,
    LINe
    82212
    »>
    '.00
    ;;::
    '00
    ,
    ,
    N
    .00
    ~
    ~
    ,.
    -<'","~UNeS22H
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ~
    <i.e.<UHE
    S22trJ
    il
    li!
    ,
    !il:
    +,
    ,
    ,
    +
    +
    -,
    +
    SPM#2 Anchor Leg #6
    ,
    ~
    ,
    , ,I,
    ::-+--+---'-------"'4------ll.....----+--..::..------t"---...c-----'----+---..::.-----
    +,L.--<;i(,dINESlP:M
    l"A;Sr
    .. SPM#2 PLET
    l
    '"
    ~~~~_~
    ____!_________
    ~~~--------JL--_t----l.....l.....---------~,,------------l--_t------!0---------4-2~~-
    ~
    _u~s~~»~sr
    +
    .. SPM#1 PLET
    ,
    ,
    ,
    J
    +
    +
    SPM#1 Anchor Leg #2 ,
    ,
    ,
    I
    1
    '"
    +
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    .•
    ..
    ,
    ,
    MAP OF SOIL BORINGS AND SUBBOTTOM PROFILE LINES
    Texas Offshore Port System
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    ,
    '"
    ,
    ,
    ....«
    LINE .'5;,,'201
    IJM~
    $Z2Qt)
    ,..»
    PLATE 2-3
    -@-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    alt
    3
    SITE SPECIFIC SOIL AND PILE DESIGN INFORMATION
    3.1 SPM #1 PLET LOCATION
    3.1.1
    Introduction
    The field investigation at the location designated as SPM #1 PLET was performed on June 27 and
    28,2008. Soil sampling was performed to 131-ft penetration at Texas South Central Zone Coordinates
    X
    =
    3,276,615 ft and Y
    =
    265,270 ft. The measured water depth ranged from 112 to 113 ft.
    3.1.2
    Soil Stratigraphy
    The soil stratigraphy disclosed by the field and laboratory investigations is presented
    on the boring
    log, Plate 3-1. The soil stratigraphy is based on the classification of soil samples recovered from the boring
    and observations made during drilling operations.
    A generalized summary
    of the major soil strata is
    tabulated below.
    Penetration, ft
    Stratum
    From
    To
    Description
    I
    0
    5
    Very soft lean clay
    II
    5
    28
    Loose to medium dense sandy silt to silt
    with sand
    III
    28
    43
    Firm lean clay
    IV
    43
    56
    Medium dense silt to silty fine sand
    V
    56
    131
    Firm to very stiff clay
    Detailed soil descriptions that include textural variations and inclusions are noted on the boring log.
    A key to the terms and symbols used on the boring
    log is presented on Plate 2-2. The Roman numeral
    representing each stratum is also shown
    on the boring log and on relevant plates. The variation in soil
    stratigraphy across this site
    is indicated in a comparison (integration) of the geophysical and geotechnical
    soil information presented
    on Plate 3-2.
    3.1.2.1 Interpretation
    of Soil Properties
    The shear strength and submerged unit weight profiles shown
    on Plates 3-3 and 3-4, respectively,
    best represent the assembled test results plotted
    on the boring log.
    These profiles were used in the
    engineering analyses.
    3.1.3
    Pile Design Information
    The pile design information developed for this study includes ultimate axial capacities, axial load-
    pile movement data,
    and lateral soil resistance-pile deflection (p-y) characteristics. The analytical methods
    used to develop this information are presented briefly
    in Section 2.5 and in more detail in Appendix B.
    3.1.3.1 Axial Pile Design
    Ultimate Axial Capacity. The unit skin friction and unit end bearing values plotted
    on Plates 3-5
    and 3-6, respectively were calculated using the API RP 2A methods described in Appendix B. These values
    were used
    to calculate the ultimate axial compressive and tensile capacities for 24-in.-diameter pipe piles,
    [ ___
    ~
    _____
    R_ep_o_rt_N_O_.O_2_0_1-_65_0_1___________________________________________________________3_.1_______

    alt
    driven to final penetration at the boring location. Axial capacity curves for driven pipe piles (conductors,
    caissons, anchor and foundation piles) are presented
    on Plate 3-7.
    API
    RP 2A recommends that pile penetrations be selected using appropriate factors of safety or
    pile resistance factors. These factors are discussed
    in Section 2.5.1 of this report.
    Axial
    Load Transfer Data. Axial load-pile movement analyses are usually performed using a
    computer solution based on methods developed by Reese (1964) or Matlock, et
    al. (1976). Plates 3-8 and
    3-9 presents the results
    as side load-side movement (t-z) and tip load-tip movement (Q-z) data for 24-in.-
    diameter driven pipe piles, respectively. The presented Q-z data should be used for foundation piles and
    neglected for caissons and conductor design. In developing the axial load transfer data in the cohesive
    soils, a post-peak adhesion ratio of 0.90 was utilized.
    3.1.3.2 Lateral Pile Design Data
    The soil resistance-pile deflection (p-y) characteristics of the soils at the boring location were
    developed for individual 24-in.-diameter driven pipe piles. These data may be used
    in lateral load analyses
    of driven piles, conductors and caissons.
    The p-y data for cyclic loading were developed to 100-ft
    penetration using procedures that have been outlined
    in API RP 2A and briefly explained in Appendix B.
    The stratigraphy and parameters used to develop the p-y data are presented on Plate 3-10. The p-y data
    for 24-in.-diameter driven pipe piles are presented on Plate 3-11. P-y values presented at 100-ft penetration
    may
    be used for lateral load analyses at greater depths.
    3.1.4
    Seafloor Bearing Capacity
    Ultimate bearing capacity equations for the near-surface soils were taken from a design method
    developed by Skempton (1951) based
    on undisturbed shear strength. The following equations can be used
    to determine the ultimate bearing capacity for horizontal tubular members and' mud mats resting on the
    seafloor:
    qu
    =
    1000
    for tubular members and
    qu
    =
    (1000)(1 + 0.2 B/L)
    for mud mats for B
    :>
    50 ft
    where:
    qu
    =
    ultimate bearing capacity, psf;
    B
    =
    width of mud mat, ft; and
    L
    =
    length of mud mat, ft.
    For horizontal tubular members penetrating less than one radius, the projected area at the mud line
    should be used to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of the members. For members penetrating one
    radius or more, the diameter should
    be used. For triangular-shaped mud mats, B should be taken as 75
    percent
    of the least altitude and L should be taken as the longest side.
    API
    RP 2A recommends that appropriate factors of safety be applied to the capacity values. These
    factors are discussed
    in Section 2.6.1 of this report.
    I __
    ~
    _____
    Re_p_o_rt_N_O_.O_2_01_-_65_0_1___________________________________________________________3_-2______

    alt

    alt
    I
    @
    D-'T:~
    rr- - - - -,.
    " -
    Date,
    f, W"I;.
    x
    =
    3,276,615'
    IDENTIFICATION TESTS,
    [%1
    Y =265,270'
    BLOW
    20
    .0
    60
    80
    UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH
    COUNT
    [ksij
    Texas South Central Zone Coordinates
    SUBMERGED UNIT WEIGHT, [kef]
    -r-'~
    ;0
    ro
    0
    "0
    a
    "-
    Z
    ?
    0
    <l>
    ~
    5
    :<
    <.n
    SEAFLOOR AT EL. - 112'
    0.03
    0,04
    0.05
    0.06
    0.2
    0.'
    0.6
    0.8
    ~
    VERY SOFT OLIVE GRAY LEAN CLAY
    WOH.
    00
    -with many sand pockets and few shell fragments
    +--
    -----fl
    ~
    [
    I
    102'
    00'
    o
    -with sand and 511t pockets and a
    few
    silt seams
    WOH
    0
    0+•
    at 3'
    +--
    ---..
    0
    15.0'
    LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE GRAY SANDY
    SILT
    TO SILT WITH SAND
    ,
    0
    -greenish gray, with a few clay seams, S'
    to
    10'
    o
    5
    10
    '-
    ...
    -motUed with brownish yellow at 10'
    20
    10
    '<if
    ~
    ...
    -with mica and a few shell fragments at 13'
    12
    .0
    ...
    16
    ~
    ...:
    0
    15
    0
    'iii
    Q)
    (/)
    ~
    20
    a;
    ro
    '- :-:
    -with a few clay pockets and shell fragments
    II ..:
    below 15'
    ,
    0
    ,
    -
    .0
    15
    ...:
    0
    0
    0=
    Q)
    ro
    (/)
    20
    a;
    ro
    ~
    c
    0
    Q)
    ~
    25
    c
    Q)
    tL
    10
    -
    r---
    <28.0't
    FIRM OLIVE GRAY LEAN CLAY
    12
    0
    c
    .2
    25
    rn
    ~
    Q)
    c
    Q)
    tL
    30
    I-
    -with sand at 28'
    ;
    -+e
    30
    35
    -
    .with many silt pockets to 35'
    III
    8
    !.
    00
    ~
    I-
    0
    ...
    35
    -with many sand pockets and a few wood and snell
    fragments and sand seams below 38'
    10
    0
    ~
    +-
    ....-.
    ~
    +
    SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
    CLASSIFICATION TESTS
    STRENGTH TESTS
    40
    40
    Number ef blews ef a 175-lb weight (hammer) dropped approldmately 5 file produce a
    .,.
    SOLUBILITY IN HCL,
    [%]
    @
    POCKET PENETROMETER (PP)
    maximum ef24 In. of penetration of a 2.25-in.-OD, 2.125-in.-ID thin-walled lube
    PERCENT PASSING -200 SIEVE, [%1
    TORVANE (TV)
    ~
    sampler. "PUSH" denotes a 3.00-ln.-OD, 2.83-in.-ID thin-walled tube sampler was
    WATER CONTENT (W),
    [%]
    ¢>
    REMOTEVANE(RV)
    advanced 24 in. with !he weight efthe drill string. "WOW denotes a 2.S0-ln.-OD,
    0
    SUBMERGED UNIT WEIGHT (SUW)
    MINIATURE VANE (MV)
    (~
    RESIDUAL (MVres) VALUE)
    2.125-in._ID liner samplerwas advanced 24 in. with the weight of the hammer.
    .&. UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL (UU)
    C"
    ~
    PLASTIC LIMIT (PL)
    LIQUID LIMIT (ll)
    +----------------------+
    (Open symbots indicate remolded (r) tests)
    LOG OF BORING AND TEST RESULTS
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM #1 PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    ---
    ._-

    alt

    alt
    I
    ~
    Q)
    ~
    ..:
    0
    0
    <;::
    III
    Q)
    (J)
    ;=
    0
    Q)
    In
    c
    0
    :;:::;
    ~
    Q)
    c
    I.
    a.
    Q)
    iog~
    .~~
    ,.
    ,;
    ,.
    ;;
    "
    "
    ~
    '"
    ~
    .ii-
    .,
    >.
    u
    u
    ~
    0
    ~
    ~
    ~
    ~
    "
    «
    o
    0.0
    0.5
    Shear Strength Profile, [ksf]
    1.0
    1.5
    2.0
    I
    ~~-.-
    1----
    --_.-
    1--_.-
    ---
    $ =
    20°.
    B=
    5°. N
    q
    = B.a. !m.,.
    =
    1.0 kg!, qmax
    =
    akg!
    II
    20
    2.5
    ---'-
    r----
    --_.-
    1---'-
    ---.-
    40
    60
    80
    100
    120
    140
    \
    III
    --_.-
    I-L __
    ---.-
    1----
    ---
    $ =
    25°,
    B=
    0°, N
    q
    = 12.0, !m
    = 1.4 kg!, qmax =
    60 kg!
    IV
    ~--.-
    ----
    --~-.-
    ~--.-
    ---
    \
    \
    V
    INote: Roman numerals refer to the stratigraPhY, as
    described in the text and on the boring log.
    I
    ------------------
    ___i_
    -----
    DESIGN STRENGTH PARAMETERS
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM
    #1 PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    I
    _@
    Report No. 0201.6501
    PLATE
    3.3

    alt
    i
    [
    [
    I
    I
    I~
    I-'~
    c
    !
    I
    I~
    c
    ~
    "'"
    Q)
    ~.
    ..:
    0
    0
    <;::::
    «l
    Q)
    (J)
    ..Q
    :::
    Q)
    aJ
    c
    0
    :;:;
    «l
    J:l
    (])
    c
    Q)
    0...
    Submerged Unit Weight, [kef]
    o
    000
    O~
    OW
    000
    008
    I
    010
    20
    40
    60
    80
    100
    120
    140
    I
    f----------
    -
    --~
    ---
    II
    f----.-
    ---~
    ---
    '-------
    -----
    Il!
    r---'-
    ----
    --- ---.--
    ---
    I
    Not.: Roman numerals refer to the straligraphy as
    V
    IV
    described in the text and on the boring log.
    f------------~-
    ---'
    ---
    ---
    V
    ------------
    --
    --~-
    ------
    ------
    DESIGN SUBMERGED UNIT WEIGHT
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM
    #1
    PLET
    Block A-36 , Galveston Area
    [
    _~_R-e-po-rt-N-0.-O-20-1--65-0-1~----------------------------------------
    _____
    P~
    __
    TE_34
    _____

    alt
    I~
    I-~
    o
    ~
    I~
    I
    I
    I
    ~
    .ii-
    0
    Jl
    ~
    M
    0
    ~
    "'
    '"
    0
    e
    >
    ~
    «
    ~
    'iii
    ~
    ..:
    o
    'lij
    Ql
    C/)
    ~
    Ql
    In
    Unit Skin Friction, [ksf]
    0.0
    0.5
    1.0
    1.5
    2.0
    2.5
    O~----~------~-------r------~------'
    I
    -_._------_._--_.- --_.-
    II
    20~~*---~-------+--------Y-~--~~------~
    ~
    -\->-.....\1- ------------. ---.-.-, - - --
    \
    III
    40~~--~----~----~~--+---~
    --_._-
    \
    ._~.-
    -
    ---.---~===--==- =~=
    60
    5
    80
    1------l__----l__-+-~l__----l__---__1
    Qi
    ~
    c:
    Ql
    0..
    v
    100~------~-------+------~Y-------~------~
    .
    1. Roman numerals refer to the stratigraphy as
    described in the text and on the boring log.
    Notes:
    \
    120~_2._T_en_$iO_n_an_d~oo_m_pre_s_sio_n_cu_w_.s_oo~in_cid_._.---l--~.---l-----~
    140
    1---------------------- -------
    UNIT SKIN FRICTION
    API
    RP
    2A (2000) Method
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM
    #1 PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    PLATE 3-5
    I
    Report No. 0201.6501
    ._@-----------

    alt
    [ r
    [
    r
    $.~
    .~i-
    ;;
    fi
    1ii
    0
    0
    [
    r~
    ~
    m
    '"
    £;
    [
    ~
    ~
    jj
    e
    >
    ~
    ~
    ~
    0
    «
    Unit End Bearing, [ksf]
    o
    o
    10
    20
    30
    40
    1E
    ~
    ..:
    o
    20
    40
    0::
    60
    C\l
    en
    Q)
    :w
    co
    ~
    §
    80
    ""
    ~
    Q)
    c
    a.
    Q)
    100
    120
    140
    -----
    ---
    ---.-
    ,----
    \
    \
    ,
    "-
    '<',
    f--
    f--
    f----
    1-------
    -
    ---.-
    ,----
    /
    ~-
    ~
    Notes:
    1. Roman numerals refer to the stratigraphy as
    described in the text and on the boring log.
    2. Dashed line represents equivalent unit end
    bearing available from frictional resistance
    of soil plug inside the indicated pile size.
    3. End bearing component is neglected for
    caissons and conductors.
    .
    ___L_
    ------ ------
    UNIT END BEARING
    API RP 2A (2000) Method
    I
    ---
    II
    ---
    III
    ---
    IV
    --
    V
    .
    .
    -----
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM #1 PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    50
    1 __
    ~_R_e_po_rt_N_O
    ___
    02_0_1_-6_50_1____________________________________________________________P_LA
    __
    TE__
    3-_6____

    alt
    I
    \
    I
    I~
    ;;,
    '"
    ~
    ~
    u
    ~
    "
    ~
    ;;,
    '"
    ~
    ~
    ~
    ~
    '"
    if
    ~
    i....:-
    a
    20
    40
    iii
    60
    ID
    (j)
    "iii
    ~
    III
    5
    80
    ~
    Q)
    c:
    a.
    ID
    100
    120
    140
    Ultimate Axial Capacity, [kips]
    . 200
    400
    600
    800
    1000
    I
    ,,--_.-
    1----
    --_.-
    r---.~
    _._-
    Note: Roman numerals refer to the stratigraphy as
    ,
    described in the
    text
    and on the boring log.
    ,
    -- Compression for piles
    -
    -
    Tension for piles, or tension and compression
    II
    : I
    for caissons and conductors
    \
    f-"{ -.-.-
    1----
    ---.-
    r---.-
    ---
    \\
    III
    ~~
    1----
    ---.-
    r---.-
    ---
    .
    \
    D
    IV
    --
    ..
    -..;~
    \
    1----
    --_.-
    r----
    ---
    ,
    I'
    \
    .
    \
    \
    "\
    ,"\
    ~
    \
    V
    ~~
    ~
    "-
    .
    "~
    1------
    ------------
    ------'
    "-
    ~---
    -'-
    ULTIMATE AXIAL CAPACITY
    API RP 2A (2000) Method
    24-in."Diameter Driven Pipe Piles
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM #1 PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    I
    _~_R_e_po_rt_N_O._02~O~1-~65~01
    _________________________________
    ~P_~
    __
    TE_3_-7___

    alt
    I~
    [-~
    ;;
    "
    .,
    ;:.
    c
    ~
    "
    [
    I
    ~
    i
    ;;
    .!i
    "
    "
    ~
    >.
    ..
    ~
    PENETRATION
    BELOW
    CURVE POINTS
    MUDLINE
    (feel)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    0.0
    I
    0.00
    0.00
    0.00
    0.00
    0.00
    0.00
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    1.0
    I
    0.00
    0.02
    0.04
    0.05
    0.06
    0.07
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    4.0
    I
    0.00
    0.03
    0.05
    0.07
    0.09
    0.10
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    5.0
    I
    0.00
    0.03
    0.06
    0.08
    0.10
    0.11
    .
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    5.0
    I
    0.00
    0.05
    0.05
    z
    0.00
    0.10
    24.00
    28.0
    I
    0.00
    0.35
    0.35
    z
    0.00
    0.10
    24.00
    28.0
    I
    0.00
    0.14
    0.23
    0.34
    0.41
    0.45
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    42.0
    I
    0.00
    0.18
    0.31
    0.46
    0.55
    0.61
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    43.0
    I
    0.00
    0.19
    0.31
    0.46
    0.56
    0.62
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14.
    0.19
    0.24
    43.0
    I
    0.00
    0.73
    0.73
    z
    0.00
    0.10
    24.00
    56.0
    I
    0.00
    0.94
    0.94
    z
    0.00
    0.10
    24.00
    56.0
    I
    0.00
    0.29
    0.48
    0.72
    0.87
    0.96
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    88.0
    I
    0.00
    0.40
    0.67
    1.00
    1.20
    1.33
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    119.0
    I
    0.00
    0.50
    0.84
    1.25
    1.50
    1.67
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    131.0
    I
    0.00
    0.54
    0.90
    1.35
    1.63
    1.81
    z
    0.00
    0.04
    0.07
    0.14
    0.19
    0.24
    Notes: 1. "t" is mobilized soil-pile adhesion, [ksf}.
    2.
    liZ"
    is axial pile displacement, [in.}.
    3. Data for tension and compression coincide.
    AXIAL LOAD TRANSFER DATA
    (T-Z DATA)
    API
    RP
    2A (2000) Method
    24-in.-Diameter Driven Pipe Piles
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM
    #1 PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    7
    8
    0.00
    0.00
    0.48
    24.00
    0.06
    0.06
    0.48
    24.00
    0.09
    0.09
    0.48
    24.00
    0.10
    0.10
    0.48
    24.00
    0.41
    0.41
    0.48
    24.00
    0.55
    0.55
    0.48
    24.00
    0.56
    0.56
    0.48
    24.00
    0.87
    0.87
    0.48
    24.00
    1.20
    1.20
    0.48
    24.00
    1.50
    1.50
    0.48
    24.00
    1.63
    1.63
    0.48
    24.00
    \
    Report No.
    0201-6501
    PLATE 3-8
    -@--------------------------------

    alt
    I~
    ~~
    11
    0
    I
    I~
    >.
    m
    c
    0
    ~
    I
    I
    ,~
    l'iti
    "-.!
    ~
    ..
    ;;
    M
    0
    "
    0
    ~
    m
    >.
    u
    ~
    PENETRATION
    BELOW
    CURVE POINTS
    MUDLINE
    (feet)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    56.0
    Q
    0
    8
    16
    24
    29
    z
    0.00
    0.05
    0.31
    1.01
    1.75
    131.0
    Q
    0
    13
    27
    40
    48
    z
    0.00
    0.05
    0.31
    1.01
    1.75
    Notes: 1. "a" is mobilized end bearing capacity, [kips}.
    2. "z" is axial tip displacement, [in.].
    AXIAL LOAD TRANSFER DATA
    (Q-Z DATA)
    API RP 2A (2000) Method
    24-in.-Diameter Driven Pipe Piles
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM
    #1 PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    6
    7
    33
    33
    2.40
    24.00
    54
    54
    2.40
    24.00
    I __
    ~_R_e_po_rt_N_O_.0_20_1_-6_50_1
    ________________________________________________________
    P_~_T_E_3_-9
    ___

    alt
    Firm to very stiff clay
    8
    50
    =
    2.0 % at 56'
    decreasing linearly to
    8
    50
    =1.0
    % at
    100'
    100' -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    _@eport No. 0201-6501
    Notes:
    1.
    850
    is axial strain at half of peak deviator stress for cohesive soils.
    2. Soil strength parameters are shown on Plate 3-3.
    3. Submerged unit weight profile is shown on Plate 3-4.
    4. k is the modulus of horizontal subgrade reaction for granular soils.
    STRATIGRAPHY AND PARAMETERS FOR P-Y DATA
    Texas Offshore_Pol"! System, SPM #1
    PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    PLATE
    3-10

    alt
    fJ
    "
    >-
    "'
    c
    ~
    [~
    [
    "
    ~
    ..
    ~
    !'<i
    ;;
    ;;;
    "
    "
    ,
    >-
    >-
    "'
    "'
    ~
    PENETRATION
    BELOW
    CURVE POINTS
    MUDLINE
    (feet)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    0.0
    P
    0
    15
    23
    34
    50
    72
    y
    0.00
    0.03
    0.12
    0.36
    1.20
    3.60
    2.0
    P
    0
    20
    31
    45
    67
    96
    Y
    0.00
    0.03
    0.12
    0.36
    1.20
    3.60
    5.0
    P
    0
    28
    42
    62
    92
    132
    Y
    0.00
    0.03
    0.12
    0.36
    1.20
    3.60
    5.0
    P
    0
    39
    64
    85
    107
    123
    Y
    0.00
    0.07
    0.12
    0.17
    0.26
    0.39
    7.0
    P
    0
    70
    116
    154
    193
    221
    y
    0.00
    0.09
    0.15
    0.22
    0.33
    0.51
    11.0
    p
    0
    157
    261
    345
    434
    496
    Y
    0.00
    0.12
    0.22
    0.31
    0.47
    0.72
    15.0
    P
    0
    276
    460
    608
    764
    875
    Y
    0.00
    0.16
    0.28
    0.41
    0.61
    0.94
    19.0
    P
    0
    422
    703
    928
    1167
    1336
    Y
    0.00
    0.19
    0.34
    0.49
    0.73
    1.13
    28.0
    P
    0
    631
    1051
    1388
    1745
    1998
    Y
    0.00
    0.19
    0.34
    0.50
    0.74
    1.15
    28.0
    P
    0
    113
    173
    255
    375
    540
    Y
    0.00
    0.03
    0.12
    0.36
    1.20
    3.60
    43.0
    P
    0
    140
    214
    316
    465
    670
    Y
    0.00
    0.03
    0.12
    0.36
    1.20
    3.60
    43.0
    P
    0
    1765
    2941
    3882
    4882
    5588
    Y
    0.00
    0.18
    0.31
    0.45
    0.68
    1.04
    56.0
    P
    0
    2269
    3782
    4992
    6278
    7186
    Y
    0.00
    0.17
    0.31
    0.45
    0.67
    1.03
    56.0
    P
    0
    259
    397
    587
    863
    1242
    Y
    0.00
    0.03
    0.12
    0.36
    1.20
    3.60
    100.0
    P
    0
    358
    549
    811
    1192
    1717
    (and below)
    y
    0.00
    0.02
    0.06
    0.18
    0.60
    1.80
    Notes: 1.
    "p"
    is soil resistance, [Ib/in.].
    2.
    "'I'
    is lateral deflection, [in.].
    P-YDATA
    (CYCLIC LOADING)
    API
    RP
    2A (2000) Method
    24-in.-Diameter Driven Pipe Piles
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM
    #1 PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    -
    -
    -
    7
    8
    0
    0
    18.00
    24.00
    16
    16
    18.00
    24.00
    55
    55
    18.00
    24.00
    128
    129
    0.57
    24.00
    231
    233
    .
    0.73
    24;00
    517
    522
    1.05
    24.00
    911
    921
    1.35
    24.00
    1392
    1406
    1.63
    24.00
    2082
    2103
    1.66
    24.00 .
    540
    24.00
    670
    24.00
    5823
    5882
    1.51
    24.00
    7488
    7564
    1.49
    24.00
    1242
    24.00
    1717
    24.00
    I
    Report No. 0201-6501
    PLATE 3-11
    -~---------------------------------

    alt
    I
    4
    CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
    The TOPS geotechnical program was conducted to investigate soil conditions within the proposed
    SPM
    #1 and SPM #2 facilities located in Block A-36 of the Galveston Area in the Gulf of Mexico. The
    program consisted of four soil borings, field and laboratory testing, and engineering analyses. A summary
    of the pertinent conclusions and recommendations follows:
    Soil borings across the proposed facility locations indicate a significant degree of near-
    surface soil variability. Soil conditions above 65-ft penetration show channel features
    within the block. These channel features vary both
    in depth and width across the
    block and resulted in variable soil stratigraphy and properties. FMMG recommends
    that a site-specific soil boring
    be completed at each of the anchor and PLET locations
    prior
    to design of the foundation elements.
    A scanning sonar survey was performed at each boring location and
    is available upon
    request from Fugro Chance.
    The water depth ranged from
    110ft to 113 ft across the boring locations within Block
    A-36
    in the Galveston Area.
    Final engineering design data are presented for 24- and 42-in.-diameter driven pipe
    piles for the PLET and anchor locations, respectively.
    The safety and load resistance factors should be carefully reviewed based on
    API
    RP 2A guidelines and appropriately applied to the engineering analyses presented
    in this report.
    Pile group effects and pile interaction with spud can depressions should
    be evaluated
    when the geometry and location of these elements are determined.
    Mud mat bearing capacities at the PLET locations should be reviewed when the final
    size and configurations and proximity to spud can depressions are determined.
    Pile driving problems are not expected based
    on the soil information presented in this
    study but a drivability study could
    be performed to select an appropriate hammer-pile
    combination.
    FMMG would
    be pleased to assist in re-evaluations and additional analyses.
    I
    Report No. 0201-6501
    ._@------------
    4-1

    alt
    I ------------------------------------
    I'
    5
    REFERENCES
    American Petroleum Institute (1993), Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing
    Fixed Offshore Platforms-Load and Resistance Factor Design, API Recommended Practice 2A-LRFD
    (RP 2A-LRFD), 1st Ed., API, Washington, D.C.
    American Petroleum Institute (2000), Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing
    Fixed Offshore Platforms - Working Stress Design, API Recommended Practice 2A-WSD (RP 2A-WSD),
    21st Ed., December 2000, API, Washington, D.C.
    American Society for Testing and Materials (2008), "Soil and Rock," Annual Book
    of ASTM Standards, Vol.
    4.08 and 4.09, ASTM,
    West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
    Dennis, N.D. and Olson, R.E. (1983), "Axial Capacity
    of Steel Pipe Piles in Clay," Proceedings of the
    Conference on Geotechnical Practice
    in Offshore Engineering, Austin, April, pp. 370-388.
    Fugro Geoservices, Inc. (2008), Archaeological and Hazard Survey Blocks A36 and A37 Galveston Area,
    Report No
    ..2407-1298.
    Matlock,
    H. (1970), "Correlations for Design of Laterally Loaded Piles in Soft Clay," Proceedings, 2nd
    Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Vol.
    1, pp. 577-594.
    Matlock, H., Meyer, P.L., and Holmquist, D.V. (1976), "A Program for Discrete-Element Solution
    of Axially
    Loaded Members with Linear or Nonlinear Supports," A Report to the American Petroleum Institute,
    University
    of Texas at Austin, Department of Civil Engineering, March.
    O'Neill,
    MW. and Murchison, J.M. (1983), "An Evaluation of p-y Relationships in Sands," Report PRAC
    82-41-1, Prepared for the American Petroleum Institute, Houston, May.
    Quiros, G.W., Young, A.G., Pelletier, J.H., and Chan, J.H-C. (1983), "Shear Strength Interpretation for Gulf
    of Mexico Clays," Proceedings of the Conference on Geotechnical Practice in Offshore Engineering, Austin,
    April, pp. 144-165.
    Reese, L.C. (1964), "Load vs Settlement
    of an Axially Loaded Pile," Proceedings, Symposium on Bearing
    Capacity
    of Piles, Roorkee, India.
    Skempton, A.W. (1951), "The Bearing Capacity
    of Clays," Proceedings, Building Research Congress,
    Institute
    of Civil Engineers, London, pp. 180-183.
    I
    Report No. 0201-6501
    '-@----------~
    5-1

    alt
    Date
    ~
    ~
    ,
    June
    27, 2008
    ~
    ol:::.
    I
    J
    ~
    -.;.
    i
    June 28,
    2008
    --
    Time
    From
    To
    DescriQtion
    of Activities
    .*.*
    0750
    Arrive
    in Block A-36, Galveston
    Area, SPM
    #1
    PLET
    location
    aboard the
    RN Seaprobe
    .
    0750
    1250
    Wait
    on
    weather.
    (Seas
    :
    4-6/7
    ft
    ;
    Winds
    :
    SSE15-20
    mph)
    .
    .
    *
    **
    1130
    Conduct
    pre-shift safety and weekly
    HSE meetings
    (afternoon
    shift).
    ••
    1230
    Conduct
    weekly
    HSE meeting
    (morning shift)
    .
    1250
    1410
    Set 4-point anchor
    spread.
    1410
    1515
    Perform scanning
    sonar survey.
    1515
    1530
    Rig up to drill and sample
    .
    .."'.
    1530
    Estimate water depth
    of 1
    07
    ft using echo
    sounder
    and
    110ft using wireline technique.
    1530
    1630
    Run drill p
    i
    pe to mud line
    .
    ••"'*
    1630
    Measure water depth of 112 ft using pipe
    tally/bottom sensor and
    110
    .
    8 ft using pressure
    transducer
    .
    1630
    2210
    Drill and sample. Boring terminated at 131-ft
    penetration
    .
    2210
    2245
    Pu
    ll
    drill pipe above mudline and reposition vessel.
    .*.
    "
    2245
    Measure supplemental
    water depth of
    113 ft
    using
    bottom sensor/pipe tally
    and
    111
    .
    2
    ft using
    pressure transducer
    .
    2245
    2315
    Pull drill pipe to deck
    and
    secure equipment for
    travel.
    2315
    2400
    Pul
    l
    anchors
    .
    •••
    2345
    Conduct pre-shift safety meeting
    .
    0000
    0015
    Pull anchors
    .
    0015
    •••
    Depart location.
    SUMMARY OF FIELD OPERATIONS
    Texas Offshore Port System, SPM #1
    PLET
    Block A-36, Galveston Area
    -
    I
    __
    ~
    _
    R
    _
    e
    _
    po
    _
    rt
    _
    N
    _
    O
    _
    .
    _
    O 2
    _
    0
    _
    1-
    _
    65
    _
    0
    _
    1
    _________________________________________________________
    P
    _
    ~
    _
    T
    _
    E
    _
    A
    _
    -
    _
    l
    ___

    alt
    [
    @
    ;0
    ,
    {!i
    o
    "
    z
    ?
    [;l
    :1
    in
    :1
    '"
    "U
    :;-
    ~
    '"
    C
    h
    ecked By
    :
    P\
    ob
    Approved
    B
    y:
    ,..?\.
    Summ
    a
    ry of T
    es
    t R
    es
    ult
    s
    D
    ate
    :
    9
    {"r
    t>B
    Date.,,4'/"
    Drawn By: TT;;
    ,...
    .r
    Date
    :
    0,
    /V 0
    'if
    Jo
    b No
    .
    : 0201-6501
    '
    2
    02-Sep-2008 (Ve
    r
    .
    #6)
    Borin
    g: Texas Offshore Port System
    ,
    SPM #1 PLET
    B
    l
    o
    ck: A-36
    A
    rea
    :
    Galveston
    Id
    ent
    i
    fica
    t
    i
    o
    n
    T
    ests
    St
    re
    n
    gt
    h
    Esti
    m
    ate
    Mi
    n
    i
    ature
    V
    a
    n
    e
    T
    ests
    C
    o
    m
    p
    r
    ess
    i
    o
    n T
    ests
    P
    using
    (
    ks
    l)
    (
    ks
    l)
    Uquid
    Plutic
    Moisture
    Submerged
    No, 200
    Moisture
    Confining
    U
    n
    disturbed
    Remolded
    E.
    Submerged
    Failure
    SilITlp
    l
    e
    Depth
    Uquldity
    Limit
    LImit
    Cootenl
    UnilWelllht
    Sieve
    Type
    Content
    Pressure
    Strength
    S
    t
    rength
    SII'II;n
    Unll Weight
    Stra
    i
    n
    Type
    Dr
    N,.
    (
    ft'
    Index
    (.,
    (
    '/0}
    ('A.)
    (pd)
    (%(
    Penetrometer
    T
    '
    ~
    Undisturbed
    Remolded
    Residual
    ,,~
    (%)
    (psi)
    ("'.
    Ibf)
    (%,
    (".
    (%)
    Failure
    1
    0
    .
    50
    41
    2
    1
    .
    00
    4
    4
    3
    1
    .
    50
    50
    4
    2.00
    1.06
    38
    12
    39
    4
    2.00
    35
    0.20
    0.
    1
    0
    4
    2
    .
    00
    42
    0.07
    5
    3
    .
    50
    51
    0
    .
    1
    9
    6
    4
    .
    30
    0
    .
    09
    6
    4
    .
    30
    1
    .
    06
    33
    13
    34
    6
    4.3
    0
    42
    56
    0.
    1
    5
    7
    7
    .
    00
    23
    62
    65
    8
    10
    .
    00
    24
    62
    68
    9
    14
    .
    00
    27
    58
    70
    10
    17
    .
    00
    27
    57
    62
    1
    1
    19
    .
    30
    27
    58
    71
    12
    25.00
    27
    56
    77
    1
    3
    28
    .
    50
    55
    14
    29.30
    30
    85
    I
    .
    29
    .
    30
    1.50
    27
    19
    31
    15
    34
    .
    00
    0.58
    UU
    29
    120
    0.55
    2
    .
    7
    57
    19
    A
    16
    34
    .
    50
    0.
    1
    7
    16
    34
    .5
    0
    UU
    32
    40
    0.27
    3.0
    54
    14
    A
    N
    O
    T
    ES
    :
    TY
    P
    E O
    F
    T
    E
    ST
    TYPE O
    F
    F
    A
    ILU
    R
    E
    Plu
    s Signs [+] deno
    t
    e
    t
    ests wh
    i
    ch exceede
    d
    the
    U
    - Unconfined Compression
    A - Bulge
    capacity of the measuri
    n
    g device.
    U
    U
    -
    U
    n
    co
    n
    soli
    d
    ated
    -
    U
    nd
    raine
    d
    T
    r
    iaxial
    8
    -
    Single Shear P
    l
    ane
    C
    U
    - Co
    n
    so
    li
    dated-
    Un
    d
    r
    ained T
    r
    iaxia
    l
    C - M
    u
    ltiple Shear
    P
    la
    n
    e
    NP = Non Plastic Mater
    i
    a
    l
    0
    -
    Vertical
    F
    racture
    i
    i
    I
    I

    alt
    @
    'C
    a
    ~
    "-
    Z
    ?
    o
    ~
    in
    !!i
    "
    ~
    m
    <-
    '"
    cr
    Checke
    d B
    y
    :
    no
    A
    p
    prove
    d B
    y
    :
    bt..
    Summary of T
    es
    t R
    es
    ult
    s
    Date
    :
    'th
    (
    c~
    D
    ate:f'&A
    Drawn By
    :
    1!G'''''",
    (
    Date:
    q(~
    1
    0$-
    J
    o
    b No
    .
    :
    0201-650
    1
    -2
    02-Sep-2008
    (IIer
    .
    #6)
    B
    oring: Texas Offshore Port
    System,
    SPM #1 PLET
    B
    lock: A-36
    Area
    :
    Ga
    lves
    ton
    Ide
    n
    tifi
    c
    ati
    o
    n Tests
    S
    t
    r
    e
    n
    g
    t
    h Estimate
    Mi
    ni
    atu
    r
    e
    V
    ane
    .
    T
    ests
    Co
    m
    p
    r
    ession Tests
    Passi
    n
    g
    (ksf)
    (ksf)
    Uquid
    Plastic
    M
    oisture
    Submerged
    No
    .
    200
    Moistu
    r
    e
    Confin
    i
    ng
    Undisturbed
    Remolded
    E
    _
    Submerged
    Failure
    Sample
    Depth
    Uquldity
    Limi
    t
    L
    imit
    Contllrrt
    UnitWerghl
    Si
    e
    ve
    Type
    Content
    Prenu",
    Slreng1h
    SlllIngth
    Stra
    i
    n
    Unll Wolg-ht
    Stra
    i
    n
    Ty
    J>" of
    '0.
    tftl
    Indell
    t%J
    t%J
    (%1
    t...
    t%)
    Penetromete
    r
    Torvane
    Undist
    u
    rbed
    Remo
    l
    ded
    Residul.
    l
    TUI
    t%J
    [psi)
    tu"
    [k
    s
    f)
    (%1
    (
    pet)
    [
    '!o
    j
    Fa
    il
    ure
    17
    35.00
    .75
    33
    16
    28
    0
    .
    62
    0.53
    18
    38
    .50
    0
    .
    94
    19
    39
    .
    00
    54
    2
    0
    39
    .
    50
    .
    82
    41
    16
    36
    20
    39.50
    020
    2
    0
    39
    .
    50
    28
    0.48
    0
    .
    92
    2
    1
    44.30
    30
    54
    17
    22
    49
    .
    30
    32
    54
    97
    23
    53
    .5
    0
    52
    2.
    53
    .
    8
    0
    35
    0.48
    0.34
    2
    .
    53
    .80
    1.16
    29
    20
    31
    2
    .
    54
    .30
    29
    59
    49
    2.
    59
    .
    00
    0.84
    UU
    37
    60
    0
    .
    60
    3
    .
    2
    5
    1
    12
    A
    2.
    59
    ,
    00
    0
    .21
    2
    7
    59.50
    2
    8
    60.00
    .70
    4
    1
    18
    3
    4
    0.94
    0.79
    2
    9
    63
    .50
    0
    .
    88
    3
    0
    64
    .0
    0
    53
    31
    64
    .50
    1.23
    33
    17
    37
    31
    64.50
    3
    4
    0.96
    1.1
    9
    3
    2
    67
    .
    00
    1
    .
    12
    3
    3
    67
    .
    50
    UU
    45
    1
    23
    0.56
    2.9
    5
    0
    1
    .
    AB
    N
    O
    TE
    S
    :
    TY
    PE
    O
    F TE
    S
    T
    TYP
    E
    OF FAI
    LU
    R
    E
    Plus S
    i
    g
    n
    s
    [
    +
    ]
    denote tests which
    exceeded the
    U
    - Unconfined Compression
    A
    -
    Bulge
    capacity of the measuring device
    .
    U
    U
    - U
    nco
    n
    solidated
    -
    Undrai
    n
    ed
    Tr
    iaxia
    l
    B
    - Si
    ng
    le Shea
    r
    Plane
    CU
    -
    Consol
    i
    dated-Undrained
    T
    riaxial
    C - M
    u
    ltiple Shear Plane
    NP
    =
    Non Plastic Material
    0
    - Vertical
    Fractu
    r
    e

    alt
    I
    @
    i:'
    "0
    o
    "
    z
    ?
    a,
    ~
    '"
    ~
    ."
    S
    m
    :r-
    g'
    ..-
    ,- -.
    c
    Job No.: 0201-6501-2
    02-5ep-2008 (Ver
    .
    #6
    )
    Summary of Test Results
    Boring: Texas
    Offshore Port System, SPM #1
    PLET
    Block: A-36
    Area: Galveston
    Identification Tests
    Strength Estimate
    Miniature Vane Tests
    Compression Tests
    PassIng
    (ksf)
    (ksf)
    Liquid
    prullt
    Moisture
    Submerged
    No. 2.00
    Moisture
    Connn
    l
    n51
    Undisturbed
    Remolded
    E.
    Submellled
    Failu",
    Sample
    Depth
    Uquldlty
    Limit
    Limit
    Contlnt
    UnIt WeIght
    SIeve
    Ty"
    Conte
    nt
    Pressure
    Strength
    Strength
    8tn1in
    Unit Weight
    Str.a
    in
    Typ
    .
    of
    No.
    ")
    Index
    (%)
    '%)
    '%)
    '''''
    (%)
    Penetrometer
    Torv
    ~
    l/\e
    Undisturbed
    Remolded
    Residual
    Test
    (%)
    (psi)
    ''''''
    ''''''
    (%)
    (pel)
    (%1
    F
    ai
    l
    ul"ll
    33
    67
    .
    50
    0
    .
    32
    34
    68
    .
    00
    .38
    55
    17
    32
    1
    .
    25
    1
    .
    34
    1.56
    35
    78.00
    1.50
    1
    .
    50
    36
    78
    .
    50
    UU
    119
    0.55
    50
    36
    78
    .
    5
    0
    UU
    45
    122
    1.25
    2
    .
    5
    51
    7
    AC
    37
    79,00
    41
    1
    .
    75
    1
    .
    80
    2
    .
    29
    38
    88
    .0
    0
    1
    .
    50
    1
    .
    85
    3'
    88
    .
    50
    48
    1
    .
    50
    2
    .
    00
    UU
    41
    120
    0
    .
    50
    48
    3'
    8B
    .
    SO
    UU
    42
    120
    1
    .
    60
    1
    .
    1
    50
    4
    AS
    40
    89
    .
    00
    38
    1.93
    40
    89
    .
    D
    O
    .59
    55
    17
    39
    41
    98
    .
    00
    1.75
    2.00
    42
    98
    .
    50
    1.50
    1.85
    UU
    122
    0
    .
    63
    48
    I
    42
    9
    8.
    50
    UU
    37
    122
    1.07
    0.7
    46
    4
    C
    43
    99
    ,
    00
    34
    1
    .
    89
    I
    44
    107.50
    1.75
    1
    .85
    45
    108
    .
    00
    47
    1.75
    2
    .
    00
    UU
    42
    120
    2.14
    0.8
    45
    3
    S
    46
    108
    .
    30
    40
    2
    .
    32
    46
    108
    .
    30
    .
    80
    49
    15
    42
    47
    1
    18.
    00
    2.00
    2.00
    48
    118
    .
    5
    0
    2
    .
    00
    2.15
    UU
    48
    121
    1.23
    0.5
    43
    3
    B
    48
    118
    .
    50
    UU
    121
    0
    .
    71
    45
    NOTES:
    TYPE OF TEST
    TYPE OF FAILURE
    Plus Signs
    [+)
    denote
    tests
    which e
    x
    ceeded the
    U
    -
    Uncon
    fined
    Compression
    A- Bulge
    capacity of the
    measuring device
    .
    UU-
    Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial
    B
    -
    Single Shear
    Plane
    CU-
    Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial
    C
    -
    Multiple
    Shear
    Plane
    NP
    =
    Non Plastic Material
    D
    -
    V
    erti
    ca
    l
    Fracture

    alt
    I
    @
    il'
    '"
    o
    ""
    o
    Z
    o
    '"
    ~
    .;,
    '"
    ~
    Checked By: 11. 0
    Approved By:
    /.7~
    Summary of Test Results
    Identification
    Tests
    Uquld
    Plastic
    Mol,tvre
    Submerged
    Simple
    Depth
    Liq
    uid
    ity
    Limit
    limit
    Conlent
    UnitW.
    l
    ght
    --.
    1'/
    index
    1'/
    I'M
    1%1
    '''''
    49
    119
    .
    00
    47
    so
    130
    .
    00
    51
    130.50
    53
    52
    131
    .
    0
    0
    32
    52
    131
    .
    00
    .50
    49
    16
    32
    Date
    :
    ~/z!o~
    Date
    :
    ~,;,;;.:
    Strength
    Estimate
    PUling
    (ksf)
    No. 200
    Sieve
    "I
    Penetrometer
    Torvan.
    1.50
    1
    .
    BO
    1
    .50
    2.30
    Drawn By
    :
    -rr;,,,,~
    /
    Date:
    "'/1
    /e>;
    Job No.:
    0201-6501-2
    02-Sep-200B (Ver. #6)
    Boring:
    Texas Offshore Port
    System, SPM #1
    PLET
    Block:
    A-36
    Area:
    Galveston
    Miniature Vane
    Tests
    Compression
    Tests
    (ksf)
    Mol'ltu
    flI
    Confining
    Und
    i:rtu
    rbed
    R~m
    o
    lded
    E.
    Submerged
    F
    iliure
    Type
    Contf:nt
    Pres
    l
    ure
    Strenllth
    Stl1lnlllh
    Strain
    Unit
    Weight
    Strain
    Type
    of
    Undl
    lt
    umd
    Remold,d
    fWsidLlllI
    Tu.
    "I
    IPsi)
    I""
    I""
    1%1
    (pef)
    '"
    ~
    Failure
    2
    .
    13
    UU
    30
    120
    1
    .9
    0
    0.6
    59
    3
    AC
    2
    .
    13
    ~
    NOTES
    :
    TYPE OF TEST
    TYPE
    OF
    FAILURE
    Plus Signs
    [+)
    denote tes
    t
    s
    which exceeded
    t
    he
    ..,
    U
    _
    Unconfined Compression
    A
    _
    Bulge
    capacity
    of the measunng
    deVice
    .
    ~
    UU- Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial
    B - Single Shear Plane
    ~
    CU- Consolidated-Undra
    i
    ned
    T
    riaxia
    l
    C - Multiple Shear Plane
    0
    -
    Vert
    i
    cal Fracture
    NP = Non Plast
    ic
    Material

    alt
    I
    @
    ;u
    ~
    "0
    0
    "-
    z
    100
    ~
    0
    N
    ~
    in
    90
    '"
    ~
    80
    f-
    I
    70
    (!)
    ~
    60
    >-
    co
    (!)
    z
    u;
    50
    <f)
    <:
    "-
    f-
    Z
    40
    w
    0
    n:
    w
    "-
    30
    20
    10
    0
    100
    "
    m
    ~
    ~
    C
    h
    ecked
    by:
    J,...\
    fb
    Approved
    by:
    L,7c..
    U.S. STANDARD
    SIEVE SIZES
    IN IN
    C
    HE
    S
    3
    2
    I
    Coarse
    SAMPL
    E
    NO.
    8
    10
    12
    22
    1
    3/4
    3/8
    T-.........
    I
    I
    I
    10
    GRAVE
    L
    I
    Fine
    DEPTH
    ,
    FT
    10.00
    17
    .00
    25
    .
    00
    49.30
    4
    I
    I
    I
    Dat,'(rZ/"'f'.
    Oat"
    'f7Z~~
    U.S
    .
    STANDA
    RD
    SIEVE NUMBERS
    10
    20
    40
    6
    0
    100
    !
    !~
    200
    I
    I
    I
    1
    0.1
    .07
    5
    GRAIN
    SIZE
    IN
    MILLIMETERS
    SAND
    Coarse
    I
    Medium
    I
    F
    in
    e
    Drawn
    by:
    17
    D/n
    ~
    HYD
    ROMETER
    I
    0.Q1
    S
    ILTorC
    LAY
    SYMBOL
    C
    LAS
    SI
    A
    CATlON
    o
    c
    SA
    ND
    Y
    SILT (ML)
    with
    a
    few
    clay seams
    SAN
    DY
    SILT
    (ML) with
    a
    few
    clay
    pockets and
    shell fagments
    S
    ilT
    (ML)
    'Nith sand, a
    few
    clay
    pockets and
    shell tagments
    SILT
    (
    ML
    )
    with
    a
    few clay pockets and partings
    and
    pockets
    oforgan
    i
    c
    matte
    r
    GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES
    Te
    x
    as
    Offshore
    Port
    System,
    SPM
    #1
    PLET
    Block A-36
    ,
    Galveston
    Area
    Date:
    '1/'<:1<:7')'
    0
    10
    20
    30
    f-
    I
    (!)
    40
    CO
    >-
    ~
    0
    w
    50
    z
    w
    ~
    n:
    60
    f-
    Z
    W
    0
    n:
    70
    w
    "-
    80
    90
    100
    0.002
    0.001

    alt
    1.25
    "
    V<>
    ~
    ""
    ~
    1.00
    0
    I
    ~
    ~
    <
    en
    ~
    en
    OJ
    '-
    >.
    .....
    '"
    (/')
    ~